Compositae name details

Staehelina imbricata P.J.Bergius

1179685  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1179685)

  1. Biota
  2. Plantae (Kingdom)
  3. Viridiplantae (Subkingdom)
  4. Streptophyta (Infrakingdom)
  5. Tracheophyta (Phylum (Division))
  6. Spermatophytina (Subphylum (Subdivision))
  7. Magnoliopsida (Class)
  8. Asteranae (Superorder)
  9. Asterales (Order)
  10. Compositae (Family)
  11. Carduoideae (Subfamily)
  12. Cardueae (Tribe)
  13. Staehelininae (Subtribe)
  14. Staehelina (Genus)
  15. Staehelina imbricata (Species)
 unaccepted
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
(1767). Descr. Pl. Cap.
page(s): 233 [details]   
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:C9AF3CEF-4E09-4172-B70B-4C23C14AEBFB  
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:C9AF3CEF-4E09-4172-B70B-4C23C14AEBFB [details]

Taxonomy See also Thunb. Prod. Pl. Cap. 143  
Taxonomy See also Thunb. Prod. Pl. Cap. 143 [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Staehelina imbricata P.J.Bergius. Accessed at: https://compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1179685 on 2022-10-06
Date
action
by
2007-12-13 07:42:42Z
created
Flann, Christina
2013-09-28 06:42:42Z
changed
Flann, Christina

original description (1767). Descr. Pl. Cap.
page(s): 233 [details]   
From other sources
Contributed data: Authors Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Berg. [Tropicos] [details]

Contributed data: Full Name Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Staehelina imbricata Berg. [Tropicos] [details]

Contributed data: Notes Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
ori:FSA [African Plant Database] [details]

LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:C9AF3CEF-4E09-4172-B70B-4C23C14AEBFB [details]

Taxonomy See also Thunb. Prod. Pl. Cap. 143 [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»
Website and databases developed and hosted by Flanders Marine Institute · Page generated on 2022-10-06 12:44:59+02:00 · Contact: Mauricio Bonifacino