Compositae name details

Munnozia eriocalyx (S.F.Blake) H.Rob. & Brettell

1172411  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1172411)

  1. Biota
  2. Plantae (Kingdom)
  3. Viridiplantae (Subkingdom)
  4. Streptophyta (Infrakingdom)
  5. Tracheophyta (Phylum (Division))
  6. Spermatophytina (Subphylum (Subdivision))
  7. Magnoliopsida (Class)
  8. Asteranae (Superorder)
  9. Asterales (Order)
  10. Compositae (Family)
  11. Vernonioideae (Subfamily)
  12. Liabeae (Tribe)
  13. Munnoziinae (Subtribe)
  14. Munnozia (Genus)
  15. Munnozia eriocalyx (Species)
 unaccepted
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
(of Liabum eriocalyx S.F.Blake) (1927). J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 17
page(s): 297 [details] 
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:95BAB245-072A-49EA-AD1A-281012F3C7E2  
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:95BAB245-072A-49EA-AD1A-281012F3C7E2 [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2025). Global Compositae Database. Munnozia eriocalyx (S.F.Blake) H.Rob. & Brettell. Accessed at: https://compositae.org/gcd/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1172411 on 2025-04-26
Date
action
by
2008-05-22 06:42:42Z
created
Flann, Christina
2013-09-25 06:42:42Z
changed
Flann, Christina

original description (of Liabum eriocalyx S.F.Blake) (1927). J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 17
page(s): 297 [details] 
Unreviewed
Contributed data: Authors Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
(S.F. Blake) H. Rob. & Brettell [Tropicos] [details]

Contributed data: Basionym Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Liabum eriocalyx S.F. Blake [Tropicos] [details]

Contributed data: Full Name Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Munnozia eriocalyx (S.F. Blake) H. Rob. & Brettell [Tropicos] [details]

LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:95BAB245-072A-49EA-AD1A-281012F3C7E2 [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»
Website and databases developed and hosted by Flanders Marine Institute · Page generated on 2025-05-02 08:10:14+02:00 · Contact: Mauricio Bonifacino