Taxonomy Notes from Flann et al. 2010 Taxon 59: Type - (designated by Nesom, 1994: 188, 259): Aster corymbosus Aiton (E. corymbosa...
Taxonomy Notes from Flann et al. 2010 Taxon 59: Type - (designated by Nesom, 1994: 188, 259): Aster corymbosus Aiton (E. corymbosa (Aiton) Cass. in Cuvier , Dict. Sci. Nat. 37: 487 1825) [= E. divaricata (L.) G. L. Nesom, Aster divaricatus L. Notes: The situation resembles that found in Eriocline (q.v.), except for one important point that makes all the difference. Here, too, Cassini definitely first described Eurybia as a subgenus of Aster. Subsequently (in Cuvier, Dict. Sci. Nat. 16: 46. 1820) he refers to Eurybia as ‘Ce nouveau genre de plantes, ou plutôt ce sous-genre’ (This new genus of plants, or rather sub-genus). But then he goes on to consistently discuss the taxon as a subgenus, never using the term ‘genre’ or ‘générique’. There is no way of considering that treatment as an upgrading of the subgenus to generic rank, as done in ING. As noted above, and as correctly pointed out by Nesom (1994), that upgrading was first effected in the following year by S. F. Gray. [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Eurybia (Cass.) Gray. Accessed at: https://compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1076413 on 2024-05-01
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From other sources
Contributed data: Authors Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record (Cass.) Cass. [Euro+Med] (Cass.) Cass. [Funk et al. 2009] (Cass.) Cass. [Govaerts World Compositae Checklist A-G] (Cass.) Cass. [LCR Editor] (Cass.) Cass. [Preliminary Checklist of North American Compositae] (Cass.) Cass. [Tropicos] (Cass.) S.F. Gray [Kadereit & Jeffrey 2007] (Cass.) S.F. Gray. [Flora Malesiana] Cass. [New Zealand Plant Name Database] Gray [IPNI] [details] Contributed data: Basionym Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record Aster subg. Eurybia [Govaerts World Compositae Checklist A-G] Aster subgen. Eurybia Cass. [Tropicos] [details] Contributed data: Full Name Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record Eurybia (Cass.) Cass. [Euro+Med] Eurybia (Cass.) Cass. [Funk et al. 2009] Eurybia (Cass.) Cass. [Govaerts World Compositae Checklist A-G] Eurybia (Cass.) Cass. [Preliminary Checklist of North American Compositae] Eurybia (Cass.) Cass. [Tropicos] Eurybia (Cass.) S.F. Gray [Kadereit & Jeffrey 2007] Eurybia (Cass.) S.F. Gray. [Flora Malesiana] Eurybia Cass. [New Zealand Plant Name Database] Eurybia Gray [IPNI] [details] Contributed data: Published Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record Cass. in Cuvir, Dict. Sci. Nat. 16. 1820. [Euro+Med] Dict. Sci. Nat. 16 [Govaerts World Compositae Checklist A-G] Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles [Second edition] 16: [Tropicos] Nat. Arr. Brit. Pl. 2 [IPNI] Nat. Arr. Brit. Pl. 2 [Kadereit & Jeffrey 2007] Nat. Arr. Brit. Pl. 2: 464 [Flann et al. 2010 Cassini Genera] [details] LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:91D49139-038C-4B89-937C-A03485CC05B5 [details] Taxonomy Notes from Flann et al. 2010 Taxon 59: Type - (designated by Nesom, 1994: 188, 259): Aster corymbosus Aiton (E. corymbosa (Aiton) Cass. in Cuvier , Dict. Sci. Nat. 37: 487 1825) [= E. divaricata (L.) G. L. Nesom, Aster divaricatus L. Notes: The situation resembles that found in Eriocline (q.v.), except for one important point that makes all the difference. Here, too, Cassini definitely first described Eurybia as a subgenus of Aster. Subsequently (in Cuvier, Dict. Sci. Nat. 16: 46. 1820) he refers to Eurybia as ‘Ce nouveau genre de plantes, ou plutôt ce sous-genre’ (This new genus of plants, or rather sub-genus). But then he goes on to consistently discuss the taxon as a subgenus, never using the term ‘genre’ or ‘générique’. There is no way of considering that treatment as an upgrading of the subgenus to generic rank, as done in ING. As noted above, and as correctly pointed out by Nesom (1994), that upgrading was first effected in the following year by S. F. Gray. [details]