Compositae name details
Stegonotus Cass.
1078394 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1078394)
unaccepted
Genus
Compositae represented as Asteraceae Bercht. & J.Presl
- Species Stegonotus undulatus Cass. (uncertain > unassessed)
(1825). Dict. Sci. Nat., ed. 2. [F. Cuvier] 35
page(s): 396 [details]
page(s): 396 [details]
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:B4FA374A-0ECC-47B5-8FFE-AA21F8FA6ACD
Taxonomy Oct 1825
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:B4FA374A-0ECC-47B5-8FFE-AA21F8FA6ACD [details]
Taxonomy Oct 1825
Taxonomy Oct 1825 [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Stegonotus Cass.. Accessed at: https://compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1078394 on 2024-05-02
Date
action
by
original description
(1825). Dict. Sci. Nat., ed. 2. [F. Cuvier] 35
page(s): 396 [details]
page(s): 396 [details]
From other sources
Contributed data: Notes Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon recordNotes from Flann et al. 2010 Taxon 59: Type - Arctotis undulata (P. J. Bergius) Gaertn. (Arctotis aspera var. undulata P. J. Bergius) [= Arctotis sp. Notes: Cassini in the protologue uses conditional mood throughout, so that one is easily misled to believe that he is not definitely accepting the new genus (which is perhaps the reason why the name is missing from the current version of ING). However, from the context, and taking into account Cassinis circumspect way of expressing himself, it is obvious that Cassini, albeit with some hesitation, wants to introduce a new genus. This is corroborated by the inclusion of Stegonotus in later synopses of Arctoteae genera. The combination ‘S. undulatus’ was not published by Cassini. [Flann et al. 2010 Cassini Genera] [details]
Contributed data: Published Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Dict. Sci. Nat. 35: 396 [Flann et al. 2010 Cassini Genera] [details]
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:B4FA374A-0ECC-47B5-8FFE-AA21F8FA6ACD [details]
Taxonomy Oct 1825 [details]
