Compositae name details

Ogcerostylus Cass.

1077594  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1077594)

 unaccepted
Genus

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
Not documented
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:174391A8-D83E-484D-93C5-407E2650FC99  
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:174391A8-D83E-484D-93C5-407E2650FC99 [details]

Status nom. illeg. superfluous = SILOXERUS Labill.  
Status nom. illeg. superfluous = SILOXERUS Labill. [details]

Taxonomy Sep 1827  
Taxonomy Sep 1827 [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Ogcerostylus Cass.. Accessed at: https://www.compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1077594 on 2024-05-09
Date
action
by
2008-03-02 07:42:42Z
created
2013-09-25 06:42:42Z
changed

Not documented
From other sources
Contributed data: Full Name Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Ogcerostylis Cass. [Tropicos] [details]

Contributed data: Notes Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Notes from Flann et al. 2010 Taxon 59: Type - Siloxerus humifusus Labill Notes: ING misspells the name ‘Ogcerostylis’. It was published as an alternative to Siloxerus Labill. and is therefore illegitimate. Although on p. 223 Cassini uses Siloxerus alone and appears to accept it, in the following generic synopsis (p. 224) he places it second to Ogcerostylus, and on p. 221 he writes ‘il nous semble que... le nom [Siloxerus] devrait être Ogcerostylus’. We therefore take it that Cassini’s intent is to reject Siloxerus, considering it to be etymologically incorrect, and this assumption is confirmed by Cassini’s later (in Cuvier, Dict. Sci. Nat. 60: 580 1830) mentioning it only parenthetically. The combination ‘O. humifusus’ was not published by Cassini. [Flann et al. 2010 Cassini Genera] [details]

LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:174391A8-D83E-484D-93C5-407E2650FC99 [details]

Status nom. illeg. superfluous = SILOXERUS Labill. [details]

Taxonomy Sep 1827 [details]