Compositae name details

Zexmenia mexiae S.F.Blake

1184795  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1184795)

  1. Biota
  2. Plantae (Kingdom)
  3. Viridiplantae (Subkingdom)
  4. Streptophyta (Infrakingdom)
  5. Tracheophyta (Phylum (Division))
  6. Spermatophytina (Subphylum (Subdivision))
  7. Magnoliopsida (Class)
  8. Asteranae (Superorder)
  9. Asterales (Order)
  10. Compositae (Family)
  11. Asteroideae (Subfamily)
  12. Heliantheae (Tribe)
  13. Ecliptinae (Subtribe)
  14. Zexmenia (Genus)
  15. Zexmenia mexiae (Species)
 unaccepted
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
Blake, S.F. (1928). Twelve new American Asteraceae. <em>J. Wash. Acad. Sci.</em> 18(2): 25-37.
page(s): 27 [details]   
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:DDFDD2EF-2145-41DD-836F-66B5D26BE1FD  
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:DDFDD2EF-2145-41DD-836F-66B5D26BE1FD [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Zexmenia mexiae S.F.Blake. Accessed at: https://compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1184795 on 2024-05-19
Date
action
by
2008-05-17 06:42:42Z
created
Flann, Christina
2013-09-30 06:42:42Z
changed
Flann, Christina

original description Blake, S.F. (1928). Twelve new American Asteraceae. <em>J. Wash. Acad. Sci.</em> 18(2): 25-37.
page(s): 27 [details]   
From other sources
Contributed data: Authors Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
S.F. Blake [Tropicos] [details]

Contributed data: Full Name Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Zexmenia mexiae S.F. Blake [Tropicos] [details]

Contributed data: Published Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 18: [Tropicos] [details]

LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:DDFDD2EF-2145-41DD-836F-66B5D26BE1FD [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»
Website and databases developed and hosted by Flanders Marine Institute · Page generated on 2024-05-20 18:30:34+02:00 · Contact: Mauricio Bonifacino