Compositae name details

Aster prunelloides (Poepp. ex Less.) Kuntze

1187642  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1187642)

  1. Biota
  2. Plantae (Kingdom)
  3. Viridiplantae (Subkingdom)
  4. Streptophyta (Infrakingdom)
  5. Tracheophyta (Phylum (Division))
  6. Spermatophytina (Subphylum (Subdivision))
  7. Magnoliopsida (Class)
  8. Asteranae (Superorder)
  9. Asterales (Order)
  10. Compositae (Family)
  11. Asteroideae (Subfamily)
  12. Astereae (Tribe)
  13. Asterinae (Subtribe)
  14. Aster (Genus)
  15. Aster prunelloides (Species)
 unaccepted
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
(1891). Revis. Gen. Pl. 1
page(s): 318 [details]   
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:10F7EC0A-D238-48B6-99A4-75B19C9500DE  
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:10F7EC0A-D238-48B6-99A4-75B19C9500DE [details]

Taxonomy 5 Nov 1891  
Taxonomy 5 Nov 1891 [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Aster prunelloides (Poepp. ex Less.) Kuntze. Accessed at: https://www.compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1187642 on 2024-04-29
Date
action
by
2008-05-03 06:42:42Z
created
Flann, Christina
2013-09-15 06:42:42Z
changed
Flann, Christina

original description (1891). Revis. Gen. Pl. 1
page(s): 318 [details]   
From other sources
Contributed data: Authors Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Kuntze [IPNI] [details]

Contributed data: Full Name Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Aster prunelloides Kuntze [IPNI] [details]

Contributed data: Published Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Revis. Gen. Pl. 1: 318 (1891) [Flora del Conosur]
Revisio Generum Plantarum 1: [Tropicos] [details]

LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:10F7EC0A-D238-48B6-99A4-75B19C9500DE [details]

Taxonomy 5 Nov 1891 [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»
Website and databases developed and hosted by Flanders Marine Institute · Page generated on 2024-04-29 02:49:01+02:00 · Contact: Mauricio Bonifacino