Compositae name details

Aster berteroi (DC.) Kuntze

1208129  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1208129)

  1. Biota
  2. Plantae (Kingdom)
  3. Viridiplantae (Subkingdom)
  4. Streptophyta (Infrakingdom)
  5. Tracheophyta (Phylum (Division))
  6. Spermatophytina (Subphylum (Subdivision))
  7. Magnoliopsida (Class)
  8. Asteranae (Superorder)
  9. Asterales (Order)
  10. Compositae (Family)
  11. Asteroideae (Subfamily)
  12. Astereae (Tribe)
  13. Asterinae (Subtribe)
  14. Aster (Genus)
  15. Aster berteroi (Species)
 unaccepted
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
(1891). Revis. Gen. Pl. 1
page(s): 317 [details]   
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:6B5C8F69-0344-434B-BA37-E05554802B9F  
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:6B5C8F69-0344-434B-BA37-E05554802B9F [details]

Taxonomy 5 Nov 1891  
Taxonomy 5 Nov 1891 [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Aster berteroi (DC.) Kuntze. Accessed at: https://www.compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1208129 on 2024-04-28
Date
action
by
2008-05-03 06:42:42Z
created
Flann, Christina
2013-09-15 06:42:42Z
changed
Flann, Christina

original description (1891). Revis. Gen. Pl. 1
page(s): 317 [details]   
From other sources
Contributed data: Authors Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Kuntze [Flora del Conosur]
Kuntze [IPNI] [details]

Contributed data: Basionym Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Haplopappus barteri [Govaerts World Compositae Checklist A-G] [details]

Contributed data: Full Name Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Aster berteroi Kuntze [Flora del Conosur]
Aster berteroi Kuntze [IPNI] [details]

LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:6B5C8F69-0344-434B-BA37-E05554802B9F [details]

Taxonomy 5 Nov 1891 [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»
Website and databases developed and hosted by Flanders Marine Institute · Page generated on 2024-04-28 21:53:21+02:00 · Contact: Mauricio Bonifacino